ゆうパケット対応 ランチバッグ 弁当袋 スタンダード 撥水・軽量タイプ ふわふわキュートなキャンディポップ
SKU: 52080697478

ゆうパケット対応 ランチバッグ 弁当袋 スタンダード 撥水・軽量タイプ ふわふわキュートなキャンディポップ

Sale price$832.50 Regular price$925.00
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 9 - Jul 14

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

ゆうパケット対応 ランチバッグ 弁当袋 スタンダード 撥水・軽量タイプ ふわふわキュートなキャンディポップ1. 2. 3. (3) 4. 5.COLORFUL CANDY QUALITY COLORFUL CANDY QUALITY 181010. 5cm(3) cm 12171912 100% :100% 1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.240 6.

1.軽量・丈夫・速乾性。トップクオリティの新素材で快適さを追及!
快適さを追求した新素材は、シワになりにくく、耐久性もバツグン。今後もおしゃれ&可愛い柄で登場予定です。

2.水を弾く素材だから、汚れに強くお手入れ簡単
水や液体が表面に弾いて滑り落ちる撥水機能。汚れてもサッと拭くだけお手入れ簡単。お洗濯も可能で衛生的にご使用いただけます。

3.内側に保冷剤用のメッシュポケットが付いたランチバッグ。持ち運びに便利な持ち手付き
取り出し口が大きく開くので、中身の出し入れがらくらく。また、持ち手付きだから持ち運びにも便利です。内側には保冷剤を入れるのに便利なメッシュポケット(底と両側の3方向)付き。お弁当を保冷でき、食中毒の予防にも安心。

4.面ファスナー仕様で開閉もスムーズ
留め位置を調節すれば、子どもの成長に伴いお弁当箱のサイズ変更にも対応できます。

5.キレイなまま長期にわたって使える品質と、安全性。COLORFUL CANDY QUALITY
国際的なテスト機関で堅牢性・安全性確認済みの素材のみを使用。仕入れから製造・販売まで、リスクを入り込ませない一貫体制。キレイなまま長期にわたって使える品質と、安全性。それがCOLORFUL CANDY QUALITY。

■推奨お弁当箱サイズについて
お弁当箱のサイズは18×10×高さ10.5cm以下のものを使用することをお勧めします。(保冷剤を3つ入れた場合)
お手持ちのお弁当箱のサイズをお確かめの上、お買い求めください。




サイズ(単位:cm)
高さ:約12~17/幅:約19/マチ:約12

※商品によってサイズに多少の誤差がございます。予めご了承ください。

素材:ポリエステル100% 裏地:ナイロン100%

※1個のご注文にかぎり、ゆうパケットでのお届けが可能になります。
1.ゆうパケットはポスト投函でのお届けとなります。ポストに入らない場合は、持ち帰ります。
2.厚さ制限があるため、複数ご注文の場合は宅急便でのお届けになります。
3.配達日時のご指定はできません。
4.代金引換は対応しておりません。
5.料金は全国一律送料240円となります。
6.決済時に配送方法「ゆうパケット」をご指定ください。



●使用におけるご注意
※ポリエステルには汚れを吸収する特性があり、汚れが強いものと一緒に洗濯してしまうと生地が黒ずんでしまう場合があります。付着した汚れが強いものとは別に洗濯して下さい
※ポリエステルには防火性がないため、火を近づけると生地が溶けてしまう可能性があります。高温のアイロンでも変形・テカリが出る場合があります。使用する際はご注意下さい、
※乾燥機にかけると変形してしまう可能性があります。もともと乾きやすい生地なので自然乾燥がおすすめです。
※熱と一緒にシワをつけてしまうとなかなか取れないので、洗濯機の脱水や乾燥は短めにしてください。
※高温のお湯だと逆汚染が起こりやすくなりますので、ぬるま湯をおすすめします。
※ポリエステル生地は日光に強い素材ですが、濃い色のものは色落ち色あせしてしまうので陰干しがおすすめです。
※色の濃いものと一緒にお洗濯は避けて下さい。
※洗濯後、長時間放置しないで下さい。
※暑い場所で長期間、他の物と一緒に放置しているとプリントの色移りする可能性があります。

●洗濯について
洗濯により若干の色落ち、濡れた状態での接触により色移りすることがございます。洗濯の際は、他のものとまとめて洗うのはお避け下さい。

●柄の出方について
柄の出方は、生地の裁断により、一点一点異なります。あらかじめご了承ください。

●商品仕様について
商品は写真と異なる場合や同等品へ仕様変更する場合がございます。予めご了承ください。
また、お揃い生地商品が完売の際はご了承ください。

その他のご注意点はこちら
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 52080697478

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 895 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
H
Verified Purchase
Hubert Herring
Cuba, US
★★★★★ 5
great resource for high school parents
Format: Paperback
A terrific book -- on many levels. It is, first, a series of excellent suspense stories, with vivid characterizations of the students seeking admission to Wesleyan. The author found some fascinating students to follow, with the result that the reader really cares what happens to them. Even more important -- especially to someone about to embark on the college hunt -- he provides an invaluable insight into how the admissions process works. The admissions game, I now realize thanks to this splendid tale, is a crazy-quilt mixture: at Wesleyan, at least, the process focuses on the individual, quirks and all, far more than I imagined. At the same time, the process comes off as frighteningly random -- with so much depending on which admissions officer reads the application, and what that person focuses on in the few minutes available. The book is also a vivid reminder that admissions officers are people, too -- people of infinite variety. So it was a pleasure to read -- and it will also prove immensely useful to parents. One common theme kept repeating: take the hard courses, even if it means lower grades. Another: having a passion is a real plus, but the rest of the record can't be a disaster. But those are just the beginning.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 11, 2003
B
Verified Purchase
Brian Tarbox
Boise, US
★★★★★ 4
Very accurate view of admission (I worked there); compelling read, enlightening even for people who think they already know
Format: Kindle
I was a Senior Interviewer during my senior year at Wesleyan 1981 and so I worked with many of the main characters in the book. Although the book describes a later time period it rang entirely true to me. The volume of applications...the controlled chaos...the searching for a hook or a champion for an application was very familiar. At least at Wes it seemed (and seems) that unless one's application has some unusual feature that the school is looking for that year (a particular athlete or a particular musician or a particular tough background that was overcome) the road to admission will be challenging. An area that did surprise me was the emphasis on the family of the applicant...and the degree to which an applicant was held to a higher standard if their parents were deemed to be college fluent. I guess this makes sense and actually provides a leveling of the playing field but it was surprising none the less. It may also be surprising to some that these days you don't just need to convince the gatekeepers that you could be successful at the school..you must also show how your presence would enhance the school. This is of course an enormous burden for most teenagers. Like it or not this is the reality at many "top" schools. If you or your child is applying to college you owe it to yourself to read this book....either to understand the game or to make an informed decision not to play.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 20, 2013
P
Verified Purchase
P. Meltzer
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 5
What is better? The overachieving 6 or underachieving 8?
Format: Hardcover
First, let me say that I thought that this was an excellent book and would recommend it to anyone who is at all interested in the college admissions process. Second, I was surprised at how many of the reviewers seemed shocked--shocked!--that applicants got bonus points for coming from minority backgrounds. Was this some kind of revelation? However one thing that surprised me a little bit is how--even moving beyond race entirely--the more advantages you have had in life, the more disadvantageous it will be for your admissions process. For example, I was unaware that having successful parents would be, in essence, held against you on the theory that more would be expected of you. While other reviewers have (jokingly?) said that they would advise their white kids not to check the "Caucasian" box, I might advise my (still very young) kids to say that their parents have been unemployed their whole life. I suppose that the main issue which this whole process really boils down to is the following: As a college applicant, is it more important to succeed in life relative to the world around you (i.e. relative to your classmates, to others of your race, to others of your geographical area, to your own parents' life and accomplishments, etc.) or is it more important to succeed absolutely and not on a relative scale. This book clearly informs us that the answer is the former and not the latter. Whether that should be the answer is another question. For example, say that a student's entire life could be distilled into 2 numbers each on a sliding scale from 1-10. The first number is simply your academic performance (grades, SAT's, course load, etc.) The second number is your background (race, economic circumstances, gender, etc.) In the case of Wesleyan, it seems clear to me that they would rather have a student whose first number was, say, a 6 if his or her second was a 2 (take Mig for example in Steinberg's book) than a student whose first number was an 8 if the second number was a 9 or 10 (take Tiffany Wang for example). Whether that is the right approach is certainly a legitimate issue for discusion and I'm not saying that it's not. I suppose that one of the things that would be interesting to know (even though one never really can know of course) is whether those numbers will change in the future. For example, if one were to know that Mig would always be a 6 and Tiffany would always be an 8, would that change the analysis as to which is the right approach? I suspect that part of the reason that a school like Wesleyan would favor the overachieving 6 over the underachieving 8 is due to the hope or expectation that those trends will continue in the future and that one day the 6 will actually be ahead of the 8. And maybe that's the way it works. Who knows.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 28, 2003
J
Verified Purchase
Jeremy W.
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
You will find out how a selective private college evaluate and admit students
Format: Paperback
I'm a high school counselor and college advisor. Fifteen years ago when I started my college counseling position, I struggled to understand or explain to students and their parents how a selective private college evaluate and admit students. It was this book that helped me understand the essence of selective private college admissions. Compared to other dry theory books, this book tells the admissions practice as stories that are easy to read, understand, and associate with. I highly recommend this book to students, parents, and new counselors.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 5, 2024
M
Verified Purchase
M. Tucker
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 3
Who edited this mess?!?!?!?
Format: Kindle
This is a very interesting work of nonfiction. I found it intriguing and read it very quickly. I actually got invested in these students and their stories and their journey to get admitted to the college that was right for them. BUT, and this is a big but, this book is so poorly edited, it is disgraceful! If a person were reading this for research purposes, and it could be useful for just that, good luck to them. The dates are all over the place. At one point, the kids are being considered for the class of 2004, then it makes a reference to the current year as 2000, then it reverts back to 2004 for a long while, then it mentions how the kids--currently at their various chosen colleges--reacted to the events of 9/11/01. What the hell? It's very confusing. It makes it very difficult to keep things in context.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 8, 2013

recommand products